Flavor Organics Inc. v. J.R. Wood Inc.

Good Law
83 F. App'x 263
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 2003No. 02-36005; D.C. No. CV-01-00298-OMPCalifornia234 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Flavor Organics appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of J.R. Wood. Specifically, it appeals the court’s determination that Flavor, through its representative David Weisman, granted its attorney Joseph Field actual authority to settle the action on its behalf. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Because the scope of authority granted to an agent is a factual issue, NLRB v. Donkin’s Inn, Inc., 532 F.2d 138,141 (9th Cir.1976), we review the district court’s findings for clear error. Troutt v. Colo. W. Ins. Co., 246 F.3d 1150, 1156 (9th Cir.2001).

The district court concluded that Weisman’s “objective manifestations” showed that he gave Field actual authority to accept the settlement agreement. Sufficient circumstantial evidence exists in the record to support the district court’s factual findings. See Kaiser Found Health Plan v. Doe, 136 Or.App. 566 , 903 P.2d 375, 379 (1995). Moreover, it is solely within the province of the district court to judge the credibility of the witnesses. See Johnson v. Tesky, 57 Or.App. 133 , 643 P.2d 1344 , 1347 n. 1 (1982). The district court’s factual finding that the testimony and evidence established that Weisman…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.