Conway
Conway v. Lewis
Opinion
Lead Opinion
*918 MEMORANDUM **
Petitioner-Appellant Conway seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . He claimed in the district court, and urges to us on appeal, that his rights under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), were violated by peremptory strikes of black jurors during voir dire in California Superior Court.
During proceedings in the district court, the state had a copy of the transcript of the voir dire hearing that it submitted to the district court. However, according to the state in oral argument before us, that transcript was not provided to Conway, who was incarcerated and not represented by Counsel. There was no evidentiary hearing in the district court. Counsel was appointed for Conway on appeal to this Court.
Because of lacunae in the record, we are unable to ascertain with clarity what happened in the Superior Court. In part, the difficulty appears to stem from the fact that Conway was not represented in the district court. We remand to the district court for appointment of counsel, and for such further development of the record as the district court deems appropriate. Proceedings on remand may include, if appropriate, an…