Ward

United States v. Ward

Good Law
83 F. App'x 933
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 15, 2003No. 03-30047California236 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Richard Allen Ward, Jr. appeals the 15-year sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (g) and 924(e). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Ward contends that U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b) required the district court to adjust his sentence for time previously served on his undischarged period of state incarceration. However, because Ward’s current state convictions were not taken into account in the calculation of the offense level for the instant offense, the district court was not obligated to adjust his federal sentence for time previously served on the state convictions. See U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b)-(c).

We reject Ward’s contention that he is entitled, under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), to a sentence adjustment for time served on the three predicate convictions used to establish his armed career criminal status. See id. at 490 (holding that “[ojther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.