Reznak

Reznak v. Rumsfeld

Good Law
83 F. App'x 968
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 19, 2003No. 02-35658; D.C. No. CV-00-00041-f-HRHCalifornia190 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Richard F. Reznak appeals the district court’s summary judgment for Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in Reznak’s action alleging that, among other things, he received a poor performance evaluation in retaliation for filing a grievance with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Wallis v. J.R. Simplot Co., 26 F.3d 885, 888 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Reznak’s retaliation claim. See Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., 281 F.3d 1054, 1065 (9th Cir.2002). Although Reznak established a prima facie case of retaliation by showing that his 1997 performance review downgraded his promotion status from “advance ahead of all others” to “advance with contemporaries,” on the heels of his filing a complaint with the EEOC, he failed to rebut defendant’s evidence that the downgrade reflected Reznak’s poor customer relations skills and hostility toward management. See id. at n. 10.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.