Singh

Singh v. Ashcroft

Good Law
84 F. App'x 971
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 2004No. 02-73121; Agency No. A76-456-339California260 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Rajinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary decision affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of Singh’s application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. Singh alleged persecution on account of his political activities as a member of the All India Sikh Students Federation (AISSF). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(1) and deny the petition for review.

We review the IJ’s credibility findings for substantial evidence and defer to credibility findings that are fairly supported by the record and supported by specific and cogent reasons for the rejection of the testimony. Mendoza Manimbao v. Ashcroft, 329 F.3d 655, 658 (9th Cir.2003). We must affirm the decision unless the record compels a finding that Singh was credible and eligible for immigration benefits. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992).

The IJ’s credibility finding is supported by substantial evidence in the record, including inconsistencies in Singh’s testimony that go to the heart of his claims of past persecution. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.