City of San Jacinto v. National Union Insurance

Good Law
84 F. App'x 980
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 6, 2004No. 02-56710; D.C. No. CV-00-00832-RTCalifornia381 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

The City of San Jacinto appeals the district court’s (1) grant of First State Insurance Company’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, (2) grant of National Union Fire Insurance Company’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, and (3) denial of the City’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint against National Union and First State.

This claim for coverage under the insurance policies is a contract claim. Hameid v. National Fire Ins. of Hartford, 31 Cal.4th 16 , 1 Cal.Rptr.3d 401 , 71 P.3d 761, 764 (2003). Under contract principles, we look first to the specific language of the *981 coverage provision. If it is clear and unambiguous, our search ends there. Id. The insurance policies provide that the claimed bodily injury or property damage must occur during the policy period. While the condition that eventually caused the gas explosion was created in 1991 during the policy period, no actual injury within the terms of the policies arose until 1996, well after the policies were no longer in effect. Thus, the district court’s grant of the motion to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings was not error. Remmer v. Glens Falls Indem. Co., 140 Cal.App.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.