Garcia-Tirado

United States v. Garcia-Tirado

Good Law
86 F. App'x 277
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 8, 2004No. 02-50395; D.C. No. CR-01-03601-IEGCalifornia534 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

ORDER & MEMORANDUM **

Pedro Garcia-Tirado appeals his conviction for attempted entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , asserting that his underlying deportation order was constitutionally defective. We agree with Garcia-Tirado that the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) failure to inform him that he was eligible for section 212(c) relief violated his due process rights. Leon-Paz, 340 F.3d at 1005-07. However, after balancing Garcia-Tirado’s positive family and community equities against the seriousness of his crime, *** Matter of Edwards, 20 I. & N. Dec. 191, 195-96 , 1990 WL 385757 (1990), we conclude that Garcia-Tirado has not made out a “plausible” claim for relief under section 212(c). United States v. Arrieta, 224 F.3d 1076, 1079-80 (9th Cir.2000).

The negative equities — essentially Garcia-Tirado’s criminal conduct — are substantial. He was sentenced to four years in jail for practicing medicine without a license and raping one of his patients during a gynecological examination. The presentence report also shows a separate arrest for spousal abuse, and no objection was filed to this part of the report.

Balanced against the seriousness of these crimes,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.