Hernandez-Vazquez

Hernandez-Vazquez v. Ashcroft

Good Law
89 F. App'x 94
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 2004No. 02-73862; Agency No. A77-233-939California244 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Heriberto Hernandez-Vazquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo the determination of statutory ineligibility. Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1145 (9th Cir.2002), and we review for substantial evidence the IJ’s findings of fact, Monjaraz-Munoz v. INS, 327 F.3d 892, 895 (9th Cir.2003), amended by 339 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition.

Hernandez-Vazquez testified that although he entered the United States in 1986 or 1987, he voluntarily returned to Mexico in 1994 after being arrested by the Border Patrol. Under the law applicable at the time, aliens were given the option to voluntarily depart the United States in lieu of formal deportation proceedings. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b) (1994). The BIA properly found that Hernandez-Vazquez did not establish the requisite ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States because his voluntary departure to avoid deportation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.