Silva-Herrera

Silva-Herrera v. Ashcroft

Good Law
89 F. App'x 98
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 2004No. 02-72545; Agency No. A72-998-127California242 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Salvador Silva-Herrera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal and the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 to review the IJ’s non-discretionary determination of statutory ineligibility, see Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002), and we review for substantial evidence the IJ’s findings of fact, Monjaraz-Munoz v. INS, 327 F.3d 892, 895 (9th Cir.2003), amended by 339 F.3d 1012 (9th Cir.2003). We review for abuse of discretion denials of motions to reopen. Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 890 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Silva-Herrera failed to prove he had ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States because his testimony was both internally inconsistent, and inconsistent with his application and affidavits. See Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425, 1431 (9th Cir.1995).

Because Silva-Herrera failed to establish statutory eligibility for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.