Kahen

Kahen v. California Court of Appeal

Good Law

89 F. App'x 113

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 2004No. 03-55970; D.C. No. CV-02-08367-AHMCalifornia117 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Eshag Kahen and Eskander Kahen appeal the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of their action seeking injunctive relief against a state appellate court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the jurisdictional dismissal under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir.2003). We affirm.

Because the Kahens seek relief from a pending state court proceeding, the district court properly dismissed their action pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. See id. at 1163 .

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.