Xian Lin Chen v. Ashcroft

Good Law
89 F. App'x 115
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 2004No. 03-70088; Agency No. A77-340-800California315 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Xian Lin Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her request for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review credibility findings for substantial evidence, Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1999), and we deny the petition for review.

The evidence in the record shows that, on the day that Chen arrived in the United States, an immigration official recorded and verified a sworn statement in which Chen stated that she was never persecuted in China, and her written questionnaire indicated she was seeking asylum only because she wanted to study in the United States. Chen’s asylum application and hearing testimony assert that she was persecuted by Chinese authorities because she was a Christian. This inconsistency is sufficiently material to form the basis for an adverse credibility determination. See id. at 1152 .

Despite Chen’s contention that her refusal to sign the sworn statement was consistent with her later testimony regarding the reasons she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.