Pena

Pena v. Ashcroft

Good Law
90 F. App'x 979
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 2004No. 02-72098; Agency No. A76-355-292California424 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Gladys Liduvina Rodriguez Pena, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the BIA’s factual findings under the substantial evidence standard. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Rodriguez Pena contends that her evidence compels a finding that she suffered past persecution by anti-government guerrillas on account of imputed political opinion. We disagree.

Rodriguez Pena testified that guerrillas threatened her and her children with death if she did not convince her former companion, who was employed by the Guatemalan government as an air traffic controller, to work for them. Rodriguez Pena testified that the guerrillas wanted her companion to help them, but did not know what kind of help the guerrillas wanted. Rodriguez did not say anything to the guerrillas when they confronted her.

Rodriguez Pena’s refusal to cooperate with the guerrillas is insufficient to show that the threats…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.