De Reyes v. Ashcroft

Good Law
92 F. App'x 482
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 9, 2004Nos. 02-71480, 02-72337 and 02-74406California1,235 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

We address three related and consolidated petitions for review. Petitioner Rosalia Lopez De Reyes petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of her application for cancellation of removal (No. 02-71480), the BIA’s first denial of De Reyes’s motion to reopen (No. 02-72337), and the BIA’s deni *484 al of De Reyes’ motion to reopen after the BIA granted her motion to reconsider (No. 02-74406).

Because the facts are known to the parties, we recount them only as necessary to explain our determination. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) began removal proceedings against De Reyes on July 7, 1998, by filing a Notice to Appear. The Notice to Appear asserted that De Reyes had illegally entered the United States. On September 14, 1998, De Reyes appeared before an Immigration Judge (“IJ”), conceded removability, and applied for cancellation of removal or, in the alternative, voluntary departure. At that time, De Reyes was married to Gustavo Reyes-Gayot, who was a party to the same removal proceedings. On February 17, 1999, Reyes-Gayot testified about the “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” that removal would have on their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.