Chaman-Hurtado

MEMORANDUM **

Heriberto Chaman-Hurtado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of two separate administrative decisions. In the first, Chaman-Hurtado appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to review Chaman-Hurtado’s contention that the BIA incorrectly applied its streamlining regulations to his case. See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 854 (9th Cir.2003). To the extent Chaman-Hurtado raises a constitutional challenge to the BIA’s streamlining regulations, which we have jurisdiction to review under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , this argument is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche, 350 F.3d at 851 . Accordingly, we dismiss in part, and *163 deny in part this portion of the petition for review.

Chaman-Hurtado also petitions pro se for review of a decision by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”), Legalization Appeals Unit (“LAU”), dismissing his appeal from the INS’s denial of his application for temporary residence status under the Special Agricultural Workers (“SAW”) program. Pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1160 (e)(3)(A), we…