Daniels

United States v. Daniels

Good Law
95 F. App'x 228
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 2004No. 03-10337; D.C. No. CR-01-00358-PMP/PALCalifornia245 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Steven Daniels appeals his 108-month sentence following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy to possess and distribute pseudoephedrine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(c)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 . We review for clear error a district court’s findings regarding a sentencing reduction for minor or minimal role. United States v. Johnson, 297 F.3d 845, 874 (9th Cir.2002). We affirm.

Daniels contends that the district court erred by not comparing his conduct to that of the other participants in the conspiracy and by not granting him a downward adjustment for a role as a minor participant. We are unpersuaded.

A downward adjustment for being a minor participant is warranted if the defendant is substantially less culpable than the average participant in the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, cmt. n. 3 (2002). To determine culpability, a defendant’s conduct is assessed against that of his co-participants in the offense. United States v. Rojas-Millan, 234 F.3d 464, 473 (9th Cir.2000). Because the district court considered the larger context of the conspiracy and Daniels’ culpability relative to the involvement of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.