United States v. Stone

Good Law
95 F. App'x 242
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 16, 2004No. 03-30113California229 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Pamela Louise Stone appeals her conviction and 135-month sentence for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, distribution to a person under 21 years old and distribution within a protected location, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a), 846, 859 and 860. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Stone contends that the district court erred in using U.S.S.G. § 2D1.11 (precursor chemicals) to determine her base offense level for sentencing. Because the district court determined that the amount of controlled substance seized did not reflect the scale of the offense, it was required to approximate the quantity of the controlled substance. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, cmt. n. 12. The district court did not err by using U.S.S.G. § 2D1.11 as part of its methodology for approximating the drug amount because all of the Culps criteria were satisfied. See United States v. Culps, 300 F.3d 1069, 1076-81 (9th Cir. 2002) (stating that when a district court approximates drug quantity it must error on the side of caution, rely upon information that has a sufficient indicia of reliability and conclude that the defendant is more likely than not responsible for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.