Doria

Doria v. Ashcroft

Good Law
97 F. App'x 109
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 2004No. 02-74371; Agency No. A38-985-426California1,252 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Victor Abadilla Doria, a native of the Phillippines, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the IJ’s denial of a continuance after his attorney failed to appear or file any documents in support of his application for a misrepresentation waiver. He contends, first, that the IJ abused his discretion in denying him a continuance, and, second, that his case should be remanded to the BIA and in turn, to the IJ, because his attorney’s actions constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. Doria also applies for a stay of voluntary departure.

We deny the petition but hold that Doria’s period of voluntary departure is stayed until the issuance of the mandate. Because the facts are familiar to the parties, we recount them only as necessary to explain our decision.

I.

Doria contends that the IJ’s denial of a continuance denied him his statutory rights to a full and fair hearing on the merits of his case and to be represented by counsel of his choice. Aliens in removal proceedings are entitled to a reasonable opportunity to present evidence on their own behalf. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(4)(B) (1999). They also have a statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.