Sanchez-Ochoa

MEMORANDUM ***

Because Sanchez-Ochoa’s waiver of his right to appeal was voluntarily, knowingly, and properly entered, it did not violate his right to due process. See, e.g., United States v. Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d 318, 321-22 (9th Cir.1990). Similarly, because *145 the government fully complied with its obligations under the terms of the agreement and because the sentencing court faithfully applied the sentencing guidelines, Sanchez-Ochoa received precisely what he bargained for in his plea agreement. United States v. Smith, 991 F.2d 1468, 1473 (9th Cir.1993); United States v. Lewis, 979 F.2d 1372, 1375 (9th Cir.1992). Therefore, Sanchez-Ochoa validly waived his statutory right of appeal and “may not now ignore his part of the bargain.” Navarro-Botello, 912 F.2d at 322 .

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.