Ogletree

MEMORANDUM **

Fletcher Louis Ogletree Jr. appeals the district court’s revocation of supervised release and imposition of an 18-month term of imprisonment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review *210 for abuse of discretion the district court’s revocation of a term of supervised release. See United States v. Daniel, 209 F.3d 1091, 1094 (9th Cir.2000). We review de novo the application of sentencing guidelines to facts and the legality of a sentence. See United States v. Phillips, 356 F.3d 1086, 1099 (9th Cir.2004); United States v. Jackson, 176 F.3d 1175, 1176 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam). We affirm.

Ogletree first contends that the district court erred in imposing a sentence consecutive to the sentence for a bank robbery conviction, which was one of the bases for the instant revocation. He contends that the district court failed to consider the relevant sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553 in deciding to sentence consecutively. We disagree. The district court reviewed the presentence report and the sentencing memoranda which address several of those sentencing factors. Moreover, bank robbery is the same offense for which Ogletree was…