Contreras

United States v. Contreras

Good Law
97 F. App'x 761
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 2004No. 03-30337California286 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Cesar S. Contreras appeals his 121-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 , and we affirm.

Contreras contends that the government breached the plea agreement by arguing *762 that Contreras’ leadership role precluded application of the “safety valve” provision pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 5C1.2. The record shows that the government upheld all of its obligations under the plea agreement, opposed a two-level increase for being the leader/organizer of the conspiracy, and recommended a sentence at the low end of the applicable guideline range. The plea agreement contained no language about the “safety valve” provision or its applicability to Contreras. Accordingly, the government did not breach the plea agreement by opposing Contreras’ request for “safety valve” relief. See United States v. Maldonado, 215 F.3d 1046, 1051-52 (9th Cir.2000).

Contreras next contends that the district court erred in applying a two-level increase based on his leadership role in the offense pursuant to United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.