Arriola

Arriola v. Ashcroft

Good Law
97 F. App'x 788
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 2004No. 03-70540,California273 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Luisa Arriola, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an im *789 migration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence. Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition in part, and grant it in part. We remand to the BIA for the limited purpose of considering Arriola’s motion to remand her case to allow her to apply for relief under the Convention Against Torture.

The IJ properly concluded that Arriola failed to present sufficient evidence to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of any of the five protected grounds. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a); 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(42)(A). Because she failed to establish eligibility for asylum, Arriola also failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

The BIA did not expressly rule on Arriola’s motion to remand her case to the IJ to allow her to apply for relief under the Convention…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.