Wayne

MEMORANDUM **

Yolanda Wayne appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of her former employer, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (“VTA”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 1 We review summary judgment de novo. Gregory v. Widnall, 153 F.3d 1071, 1074 (9th Cir.1998). We affirm.

Because the parties are familiar with the prior proceedings, we will not recite them except as necessary.

The district court did not err in its determination that Wayne did not establish a triable claim for a hostile work environment. None of the allegations, events, or incidents in the record, considered in isolation, or considered together, are severe or pervasive enough to violate Title VII. See Gregory, 153 F.3d at 1074 .

Wayne’s claim for racial discrimination regarding VTA’s failure to promote her to Senior Transportation Planner in 1997 is time-barred. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1); National R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 113 , 122 S.Ct. 2061 , 153 L.Ed.2d 106 (2002). Wayne has established a prima facie claim for racial discrimination regarding VTA’s 1999 failure to promote her because she alleges that she was qualified for the position,…