Wheaton
Wheaton v. Roe
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Nathan D. Wheaton appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Wheaton was convicted of second degree murder and assault with a firearm in California state court. He was sentenced to twenty-years-to-life for the second degree murder conviction, with an additional sentence of three years for the assault conviction. On appeal, Wheaton asserts that his due process rights were violated by the state prosecutor’s failure to disclose the identities and addresses of those persons (beyond the prosecution’s testifying witnesses) who were present at the scene of the murder and interviewed by police. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We affirm.
We review de novo a district court’s decision to grant or deny a state prisoner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, pursu *649 ant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Bribiesca v. Galaza, 215 F.3d 1015, 1018 (9th Cir.2000). Federal habeas corpus relief on a claim adjudicated on the merits by a state court is barred unless the state court decision either “(a) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal…