Bran-Delcid

Bran-Delcid v. Ashcroft

Good Law
101 F. App'x 711
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 2004No. 03-71313California563 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Maria Luisa Bran-Delcid, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence. Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425, 1431 (9th Cir.1995). We deny the petition for review in part, and dismiss in part.

Substantial evidence supported the IJ’s denial of Bran-Delcid’s asylum application because Bran-Delcid did not establish that the incidents that occurred in Guatemala in August 1991 were on account of her political opinion or any other statutorily-protected ground. See Navas v. INS, 217 F.3d 646, 655-56 (9th Cir.2000). BranDelcid also failed to show a well-founded fear of future persecution if she returned to Guatemala because she did not overcome evidence of changed country conditions. See Molino-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1095-96 (9th Cir.2002).

Because Bran-Delcid failed to establish eligibility for asylum, she necessarily failed *712 to meet the “more stringent” standard for withholding of removal. Al-Harbi v. INS, 242…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.