Lemus-Esquivel

Lemus-Esquivel v. Ashcroft

Good Law
101 F. App'x 745
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 2004No. 02-70575California328 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Lemus-Esquivel and his wife, Evangelina Chavez-Lopez (“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro *746 se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary dismissal under 8 C.F.R. § 3000.1 (d)(2)® of their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for suspension of deportation. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997). We review the BIA’s summary dismissal for failure to file a brief to determine whether it was appropriate. Vargas-Garda v. INS, 287 F.3d 882, 884 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition.

Petitioners filed a Notice of Appeal (Form EOIR — 26) with the BIA indicating their intent to file a brief, then failed to file a brief. Summary dismissal was appropriate because Petitioners’ Notice of Appeal did not sufficiently specify their grounds for appeal. See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 820-21 (9th Cir.2003); see also 8 C.F.R. § 3000.1 (d)(2)®.

Petitioners’ contention that the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act and the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act violate equal protection is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.