Stapleton

United States v. Stapleton

Good Law
102 F. App'x 568
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 2004No. 03-10482California236 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Judith Carol Stapleton appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to withdraw her guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1)—(b)(1)(B)(viii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion, see United States v. Turner, 898 F.2d 705, 713 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm.

Stapleton contends that the district court should have allowed her to withdraw her guilty plea because she only pled guilty under pressure from her attorney. The record shows, however, that Stapleton confirmed orally at her Rule 11 hearing and in her written plea agreement that her guilty plea was voluntary and not the result of threats or coercion. In denying her motion, the district court could reasonably have chosen to credit these earlier declarations over Stapleton’s subsequent statements made six months later. See United *569 States v. Nostratis, 321 F.3d 1206, 1209-12 (9th Cir.2003). Moreover, an unsupported claim of innocence does not constitute a fair and just reason for withdrawal of a guilty plea. See Turner, 898 F.2d at 713 . Accordingly, the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.