Verduzco-Martinez

Verduzco-Martinez v. Ashcroft

Good Law
102 F. App'x 569
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 2004No. 02-71257; Agency No. A75-266-472California287 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*570 MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Verduzco-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his request to apply for suspension of deportation despite being in removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider the INS’s decision regarding the commencement of immigration proceedings. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (g); Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft, 291 F.3d 594, 599 (9th Cir.2002).

Verduzco-Martinez’s contention that the INS is estopped from processing him in removal proceedings because the INS sent him a letter suggesting that he would be placed in deportation proceedings, and unreasonably delayed in processing his case, is foreclosed by Cortez-Felipe v. INS, 245 F.3d 1054, 1058 (9th Cir.2001). Verduzco-Martinez’s contention that the BIA’s summary affirmance without opinion violates due process is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 850-51 (9th Cir.2003). We therefore dismiss Verduzco-Martinez’s due process claims. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1270-71 (9th Cir.2001) (“To be colorable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.