Sandoval

Sandoval v. Ashcroft

Good Law
102 F. App'x 573
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 2004No. 02-72911California281 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Erick Estuardo Donis Sandoval, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review from the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings after the IJ’s in absentia removal order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a). We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 890-91 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the petition for review.

An order of removal entered in absentia may be rescinded if the petitioner demonstrates that he failed to appear because of exceptional circumstances. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C); Celis-Castellano, 298 F.3d at 891 . Exceptional circumstances are “circumstances (such as serious illness of the alien ... but not including less compelling circumstances) beyond the control of the alien.” 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(e)(1); Celis-Castellano, 298 F.3d at 891 . The IJ did not abuse her discretion by denying the motion to reopen because the evidence does not compel the finding that Donis Sandoval’s wife suffered from a serious illness sufficient to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.