Vincze

MEMORANDUM **

Joseph David Vincze, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison librarian, Leon Robinson, retaliated against him for filing grievances and denied him access to courts by failing to make photocopies of legal documents. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo a dismissal based on res judicata, W. Radio Sens. Co. v. Glickman, 123 F.3d 1189 , 1192 (9th Cir.1997), and we reverse and remand.

In Vincze’s prior action, Vincze v. Robinson, 48 FedAppx. 670 (9th Cir.2002) (unpublished memorandum disposition), this Court affirmed the district court’s dismissal of his claims of retaliation and interference with access to courts, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is without prejudice. See Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108 , 1120 (9th Cir.2003). A dismissal without prejudice is not an adjudication on the merits and does not have res judicata effect. See Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 396 , 110 S.Ct. 2447 , 110 L.Ed.2d 359 (1990); see also In re Marino, 181…