Shojaei

Shojaei v. Ashcroft

Good Law
103 F. App'x 158
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 2004No. 03-70577; Agency No. A75-706-688California308 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Afshin Shojaei, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review an adverse credibility finding and the denial of asylum for substantial evidence, Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.2000), and we reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion, INS v. Elias- Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Although the IJ found Shojaei not credible, she also found that Shojaei failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. We agree.

Even assuming that Shojaei testified credibly, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that the treatment Shojaei experienced, including suffering a leg injury while fleeing during the break up of a pro-democracy demonstration and being denied admission to university based on his status as a Sunni Muslim, does not rise to the level of persecution. See Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.