Salazar-Cerrano

Salazar-Cerrano v. Ashcroft

Good Law
103 F. App'x 280
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 2004No. 02-73980California258 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Salomon Salazar-Cerrano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reconsider the BIA’s earlier decision summarily affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his application for suspension of deportation. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of Salazar-Cerrano’s motion to reconsider because the motion challenged only the BIA’s discretionary determination that Salazar-Cerrano failed to meet the requisite hardship standard. See Sarmadi v. INS, 121 F.3d 1319, 1322 (9th Cir.1997) (“[WJhere Congress explicitly withdraws our jurisdiction to review a final order of deportation, our authority to review motions to reconsider or to reopen deportation proceedings is thereby likewise withdrawn.”); Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1152 (9th Cir.1997) (holding that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary hardship determination).

Contrary to Salazar-Cerrano’s contention, the BIA was not required to file an answering brief to Salazar-Cerrano’s motion to reconsider filed with the BIA. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38 (f) (indicating that briefs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.