Gedey

Gedey v. Ashcroft

Good Law
104 F. App'x 40
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 2004No. 03-70776California258 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Tareke Alemseged Gedey, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision summarily affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . *41 We review the IJ’s decision to deny asylum under the substantial evidence standard and may reverse only if the evidence would compel a reasonable factfinder to conclude that the requisite fear of persecution exists. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that petitioner failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. Any harassment petitioner received by students or other individuals did not rise to the level of past persecution, and petitioner failed to show that any fear of future persecution was not speculative. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016-18 (9th Cir.2003) (holding alien was teased, bothered, discriminated against, and harassed based on her religious beliefs, but that it did not rise to the level of persecution, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.