Lopez-Santos

United States v. Lopez-Santos

Good Law
104 F. App'x 690
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 2004No. 03-30501; D.C. No. CR-02-02202-RHWCalifornia257 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Javier Lopez-Santos appeals his 188-month sentence following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C § 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

Lopez-Santos contends that the district court erred when it denied his motion to compel the government to move for a downward departure based on substantial assistance pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 as contemplated in the plea agreement. Because the government’s stated reasons for declining to move for a downward departure were neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional, the district court did not clearly err in denying Lopez-Santos’ motion to compel. See United States v. Burrows, 36 F.3d 875, 884 (9th Cir.1994).

Lopez-Santos also contends that the district court erred in denying his requests for downward departures based on his status as a deportable alien and based on an over-representation of his criminal history. Because we lack jurisdiction to review a district court’s discretionary decision not to depart, see United States v. Pinto, 48 F.3d 384, 389 (9th Cir.1995) (‘We have held that decisions to deny downward departure will be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.