Rosa

Rosa v. Cutter Pontiac Buick GMC of Waipahu, Inc.

Good Law
105 F. App'x 895
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 2004No. 02-17003California350 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Kevin and Lilly Rosa (the Rosas) appeal the district court’s granting of Cutter Pontiac Buick GMC’s motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. The Rosas contend that their complaint and supporting exhibits adequately allege consummation of the credit transaction, and, therefore, the defendant may be held to answer for alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act.

Regulation Z defines consummation as “the time that a consumer becomes contractually obligated on a credit transaction.” Jackson v. Grant, 890 F.2d 118, 120 (9th Cir.1989) (quoting 12 C.F.R. § 226.2 (a)(13)). “When a consumer ‘becomes contractually obligated’ is, in turn, determined by looking to state law[.]” Id. In Hawaii, a credit sale contract must be in writing; contain, incorporate by reference, or otherwise clearly refer to all the agreement of the parties; and be signed by the parties. H.R.S. § 476-3(a)(l)-(3).

The Rosas did not sign the Credit Sale Contract. As the signature is an essential element of a loan contract under Hawaii law, the absence of a signature means that no loan contract was formed.

The only document signed by the Rosas was the Retail Buyers Order and Invoice. However, consummation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.