Singh

Singh v. Ashcroft

Good Law
105 F. App'x 909
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 2004No. 02-72366; Agency No. A75-314-277California396 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Gurjinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review adverse credibility determinations for substantial evidence, Singh-Kaur v. INS, 183 F.3d 1147, 1149 (9th Cir.1999), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility finding. Most notably, the record supports the IJ’s determination that Petitioner’s credibility was undermined by inconsistent testimony regarding his political involvement with the Akali Dal and the All India Sikh Student *910 Federation, as well as evidence of tampering and possible fabrication in the letters Petitioner offered to establish his involvement with several political organizations. The IJ also made note of Petitioner’s untruthful demeanor, a finding which should be given “special deference.” Paredes-Urrestarazu v. INS, 36 F.3d 801, 818-19 (9th Cir.1994).

Taken together, these inconsistencies are sufficiently material to permit the IJ to find that Singh was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.