Hernandez-Flores

Hernandez-Flores v. Ashcroft

Good Law
106 F. App'x 612
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 2004No. 02-72334, A70-940-059California285 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

*613 MEMORANDUM ***

Erick Edgardo Hernandez-Flores, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review.

Hernandez-Flores’s challenge to the BIA’s summary affirmance procedure is foreclosed by Falcon Cartiche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849-50 (9th Cir.2003).

The challenge to the decision on the merits fails because substantial evidence supports the determination that he failed to establish a cognizable ground for asylum. See Melkonian v. Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir.2003). Hernandez-Flores’s claim that he was persecuted on account of his political opinion is belied by his own testimony; he confirmed that the alleged guerrillas never accused him or his father of belonging to the national government and never imputed a political opinion upon them.

By failing to qualify for asylum, Hernandez-Flores necessarily fails to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of deportation. See Alvarez-Santos v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.