Melkonian

Melkonian v. Ashcroft

Good Law
106 F. App'x 613
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 2004No. 02-74042, A70-956-038California266 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Elena Melkonian, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review.

Melkonian’s challenge to the BIA’s summary affirmance procedure is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849-50 (9th Cir.2003).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Melkonian failed to establish persecution on account of being Jewish, in light of the documentary evidence and Melkonian’s own admissions regarding the economic difficulties facing Armenia. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003) (stating that the fact that the petitioner was fired from her job as a kindergarten teacher because of her religious beliefs, while discriminatory, is not the type of economic deprivation that rises to the level of persecution); Gormley v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2004) (holding that criminal attacks and robberies petitioner suffered did not rise to level of persecution).

By…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.