Velasquez

Velasquez v. Ashcroft

Good Law
107 F. App'x 111
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 2004Nos. 03-71616California267 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Renato Lauchengco Velasquez, his wife Wildie, and their three children, Jordana, Juan Carlos, and Jacqueline, natives and citizens of The Philippines, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). See Avetova-Elisseva v. INS, 213 F.3d 1192 , 1195 & n. 4 (9th Cir.2000). We deny the petition.

Petitioners cannot demonstrate that they hold a well-founded fear of persecution on account of one of the protected grounds under the Immigration and Nationality Act, and they are therefore not eligible for asylum. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(42)(A); Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d 1482, 1486-87 (9th Cir.1997). Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion that the New People’s Army’s threats against Petitioners were economically motivated, rather than motivated by Petitioners’ political affiliation or any imputed political beliefs. See id.; INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (noting that this court may reverse the BIA’s determination only if the evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.