Mach

Mach v. Shiriro

Good Law
107 F. App'x 720
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 2004No. 03-16321; D.C. No. CV-00-00350-WDBCalifornia335 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Arizona state prisoner William Chapman Mach appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which he challenged his conviction for sexual conduct with a minor under 14 years of age. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The district court entered its order denying Mach’s habeas petition on January 13, 2003. The order is a “final” order pursuant to Rules 54(a) and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure requires that the notice of appeal in a civil case be filed within thirty days after the entry of judgment or order. Mach did not file a notice of appeal until June 13, 2003, more than four months after the filing deadline.

Mach contends that he did not receive notice of the district court’s judgment within the time specified for filing a notice of appeal. However, “[l]ack of notice of the entry by the clerk does not affect the time to appeal or relieve or authorize the court to relieve a party for failure to appeal within the time allowed, except as permitted in Rule 4(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.