Santiago-Garcia

Santiago-Garcia v. Ashcroft

Good Law
108 F. App'x 443
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 2004No. 03-72163, A74-819-472, A74-819-471California201 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Miguel Angel Santiago-Garcia and Margarita Sanchez, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen to seek repapering. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

Petitioners would have been ineligible for suspension relief regardless of the stop-time rule, because the immigration judge found they failed to show the requisite hardship. Accordingly the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen to seek repapering. See id.; 65 Fed.Reg. 71273 (2000) (proposed 8 C.F.R. § 240.81 ) (“An alien may request repapering” if he is “[sjtatutorily eligible for suspension of deportation under former section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the time of application for *444 repapering but for the application of the stop-time rule in section 240A(d)(l).”).

Petitioners’ remaining contentions lack merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.