Alazzawe

Alazzawe v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
108 F. App'x 505
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 2004Nos. 02-72677, 03-70471California273 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Zouhrir Abid Alazzawe’s petition fails, because as conceded at oral argument, Alazzawe firmly resettled in Germany and is barred from seeking asylum from Iraq. See 8 C.F.R. § 208.13 (c)(2) (barring the government from granting “asylum to any applicant ... if the alien ... has been firmly resettled ... ”).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of the requested asylum from Germany. Alazzawe failed to show evidence compelling a finding that he “is unable or unwilling to return to [Germany] because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Melkonian v. Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 1061, 1064 (9th Cir.2003) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied Alazzawe’s motion to *506 reopen, because all the evidence Alazzawe proffered was available to him at the time of his former hearing, or would not have assisted Alazzawe in proving his asylum claim. See 8 C.F.R. § 1008.2 (c)(1) (“A motion to reopen proceedings shall not be granted unless it appears to the Board that evidence sought to be offered is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.