McAninch

United States v. McAninch

Good Law
109 F. App'x 885
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 2004No. 03-30433; D.C. No. CR-01-00445-RSLCalifornia297 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Donald Bruce McAninch appeals his 41-month sentence, imposed after his guilty plea to mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 , and mailing threatening communications, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876 . We dismiss based on the valid appeal waiver.

*886 The government contends that McAninch’s appeal waiver precludes this appeal. An appeal waiver is valid if it is knowingly and voluntarily made. See United States v. Baramdyka, 95 F.3d 840, 843 (9th Cir.1996). In determining whether the plea agreement was entered into knowingly and voluntarily, we look at the express language of the waiver and the circumstances surrounding the signing and entry of the plea agreement, including compliance with Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000). McAninch does not allege that the appeal waiver, or the plea agreement in general, is invalid, nor is there any indication of this in the record. Because McAninch knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal, the waiver bars all challenges to his conviction and sentence, and we must dismiss the appeal. See Nguyen, 235 F.3d at 1182 .

Because McAninch made a valid waiver of his right to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.