Robles

Robles v. Ashcroft

Good Law
109 F. App'x 892
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 2004No. 02-74513California351 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Francisco Buenaflor Robles, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“U”) denial of the application for asylum and withholding of removal and for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the BIA’s denial of asylum for substantial evidence and may reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that petitioner failed to establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution on account of political opinion. Since petitioner’s business was robbed, and the robber was apprehended and prosecuted, and the business is now dissolved, and there is no evidence that the robbery occurred on account of petitioner’s political opinion, substantial evidence supports the denial of asylum. See Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1094-95 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that alien must show that the persecutors imputed a political opinion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.