Conchev

Conchev v. Ashcroft

Good Law
109 F. App'x 940
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 2004No. 03-71870California429 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Kiril Krastev Conehev, a native and citizen of Bulgaria, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we grant the petition for review.

Accepting Conchev’s factual allegations as true, as we must absent an adverse credibility determination, see Navas v. INS, 217 F.3d 646 , 652 n. 3 (9th Cir.2000), Conehev has established past persecution on account of his Romani (gypsy) ethnicity. The IJ’s reliance on Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir.1995) is misplaced. See Chanchavac v. INS, 207 F.3d 584 , 590 n. 5 (9th Cir.2000) (distinguishing Prasad). Government sanction has been established, as Conehev, his sister and his mother experienced brutality at the hands of the police directly and, moreover, the police failed to investigate when Conehev and his family were attacked by ultra-nationalist private citizens. Conehev received medical treatment on one occasion and his ankle was broken on another occasion, so his injuries were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.