Kasim

Kasim v. Ashcroft

Good Law
109 F. App'x 943
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 2004No. 03-71892; Agency No. A73-986-812California260 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jony Iqbal Kasim, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation, for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and for voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We review for substantial evidence an adverse credibility determination, *944 Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility finding. The BIA offered specific, cogent reasons for its findings based on inconsistencies between petitioner’s testimony, declaration, and asylum interview going to the heart of his asylum claim, including his encounters with police, the level of harm suffered during attacks on his home, and his activities with the Jatiyo Party. See id. at 1043 . Because petitioner failed to show that he was eligible for asylum, it follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of deportation. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2003).

In addition,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.