Sidorkina

Sidorkina v. Ashcroft

Good Law
109 F. App'x 951
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 2004No. 03-72292California488 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

*952 Elena Sidorkina, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her application for asylum and withholding of removal, and request for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence, Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir.2000), and we reverse only if the evidence compels a contrary conclusion, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 , 112 S.Ct. 812 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that the acts of discrimination did not rise to the level of persecution. See Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425, 1431 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that persecution is an “extreme” concept). The incident at the park, losing her job, and the incident at the police station, while unfortunate, were not persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016 (9th Cir.2003) (record did not compel finding that being teased, bothered, discriminated against, harassed, and fired from job because of religious beliefs rose to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.