Mira-Almendariz

Mira-Almendariz v. Ashcroft

Good Law
109 F. App'x 975
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 2004No. 03-70862California305 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Luis Roberto Mira-Almendariz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) summary affirmance denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings that were conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997). We review for abuse *976 of discretion, Urbina-Osejo v. INS, 124 F.3d 1314, 1316 (9th Cir.1997), and we grant the petition.

The immigration judge (“IJ”) denied Mira-Almendariz’s motion to reopen because the Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) and Notice to Appear were mailed to the last address that Mira-Almendariz supplied at his asylum interview and MiraAlmendariz failed to submit documentary evidence that he notified the agency of his new address.

We conclude that the IJ abused her discretion by denying the motion to reopen without considering whether Mira-Almendariz received the OSC notifying him of his obligation to update his address with the agency. The IJ also failed to consider Mira-Almendariz’s sworn declaration that he did in fact provide written notice of his new address to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.