Hadiwardojo

Hadiwardojo v. Ashcroft

Good Law
110 F. App'x 42
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 2004No. 03-71877; Agency No. A77-823-372California240 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ronny Kurniawan Hadiwardojo, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that Hadiwardojo was statutorily ineligible for asylum under the one-year bar, 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (a)(3); Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 815 (9th Cir.2001); and whether he demonstrated a material change in circumstances or that extraordinary circumstances caused the delay in filing, Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.2002).

Hadiwardojo’s due process challenge fails because he did not show prejudice. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000).

Pursuant to Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), Hadiwardojo’s motion for stay of removal included a timely request for stay of voluntary departure. Because the motion for stay of removal was continued based on the government’s filing of a notice of non-opposition, the voluntary departure period was also stayed, nunc pro tunc, to the filing of the motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.