Pacquiao
Pacquiao v. Ashcroft
Opinion
Lead Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Cecilia Angkawidjaja Pacquiao, her husband, Teodoric, and her daughters, Amelia, Jenny, Candy, and Aimee, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their application for asylum and withholding of removal. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the IJ’s decision as the final agency determination, Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849 (9th Cir.2003), and we review for substantial evidence the IJ’s determination of an applicant’s eligibility for withholding of removal, Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction over the BIA’s order denying petitioners’ motion to reopen because they failed to file a separate petition for review after that order was issued. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 401 , 115 S.Ct. 1537 , 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995).
We also lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that petitioners’ asylum *51 application was not filed within the one-year limitations period, and that the time…