Valiente-Herrera

Valiente-Herrera v. Ashcroft

Good Law
110 F. App'x 761
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 14, 2004No. 02-71516; Agency No. A70-779-016California694 words

Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Leavy, J.

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The record is devoid of any evidence that the disappearance of Valiente-Herrera’s husband and the attempted abductions of her and her son were on account of a protected ground. We should not substitute our decisions in other, unrelated, appeals for the requisite evidence in this proceeding.

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Norma Yesenia Valiente-Herrera’s husband was kidnaped from a bus stop near their home. No word of him or from him has ever been received. Soon afterward, his supposed kidnapers, believed to be guerillas, threatened Valiente-Herrera, then attempted to abduct her in the same manner. They also attempted to abduct her two-year-old son by trying to wrest him from her arms on a street near their home. The immigration judge (IJ) denied asylum, holding in part that ValienteHerrera did not show past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. 1 The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirmed. We grant the petition for review and reverse.

The long history of anti-government guerrillas terrorizing innocent citizens in Guatemala on account of actual or imputed political opinion is well-established. See, e.g., Garcia-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 1066, 1074-75 (9th Cir.2004) (“The human rights abuses that took place during Guatemala’s decades-long civil war have been well-documented.”); Rios v. Ashcroft, 287 F.3d 895, 898-901 (9th Cir.2002) (holding that Guatemalan guerrillas abducted petitioner on account of imputed political opinion because of her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.